Monday, May 20, 2019

We Googled You

We Googled You The exemplar in the We Googled You article is rather tricky. On one hand, the disconcerting online revelation with Mimi protesting against mainland China serves as immobile evidence not to get her. If members of the management team based in China discover the pictures and cultivation about Mimis protests, they may decline to continue to conduct business with Hathaway Jones. It will also pause the companys reputation in the eyes of potential future customers. In addition to the searched Google results, Mimis recommendations also contained a few negative traits including brash and strongly opinionated.These aspects may not allow her to father along with other workers and colleagues. Her liberal behavior including her wink at Fred is not quite suitable for Chinas more conservative culture. On the other hand, it is possible that Virginia misunderstood the training she found online. Fred should denote Mimi directly to fully understand the situation about what really happened. It is extremely easy for someone to fudge information and manipulate digital media. With digital cameras being so prominent today, it is inevitable that personal pictures and information would end up online for everyone to Google and find out.Additionally, Mimis background includes a strong education and solid experience. Her Berkeley and Stanford degrees and onetime(prenominal) job positions will allow her to perform the job at a higher level of expertise than many other potential job applicants. As discussed in class, employers should hire based on mogul to perform and not on hard data and statistics. From these standpoints, the benefits to hiring outweigh the costs. For these reasons, I support the decision to hire Mimi. I feel that she would make an excellent addition and make a great deal of contributions to Hathaway Jones.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.